Forum Thread: google chrome 15.x

You are currently viewing a forum thread in the Secunia Community Forum. Please note that opinions expressed here are not of Secunia but solely reflect those of the user who wrote it.

This thread was submitted in the following forum:

Relating to this vendor:
And, this specific program:
Google Chrome 15.x

This thread has been marked as locked.
eshrote google chrome 15.x
Member 27th Oct, 2011 02:47
Ranking: 0
Posts: 1
User Since: 17th Mar, 2010
System Score: N/A
Location: US
google chrome 15.x

Emmery Wayne Shrote

Maurice Joyce RE: google chrome 15.x
Handling Contributor 27th Oct, 2011 11:33
Score: 12325
Posts: 9,575
User Since: 4th Jan 2009
System Score: N/A
Location: UK
Not too sure many helpers will know what U want.

The Secunia guidelines when creating a thread are:

Before creating your thread:
Please make sure to include as many details as possible. The more details, the easier it will be for other users to assist you.

If your thread relates to a problem with patching a program, please be sure to include and verify:
* The path to where the program was detected on your PC
* Description of what you've done to patch the program
* That you have rescanned your PC after applying the patch

Once U supply more details someone will assist U.


Microsoft Surface 4 Intel i7 64Bit
Windows 10 Pro version 1809 Build 17763.404
IE & Edge Only
Was this reply relevant?


Visit this site
This reply has been deleted
mogs RE: google chrome 15.x
Member 28th Oct, 2011 02:39
Posts: 6,279
User Since: 22nd Apr 2009
System Score: N/A
Location: UK
Chrome Stable 15.0.874.102 has very recently been superceded quite quickly by the following :-

Stable Channel Update
Wednesday, October 26, 2011 | 12:49
Labels: Stable updates
The Stable channel has been updated to 15.0.874.106 for Windows, Mac, Linux, and Chrome Frame. This release fixes login issues to Barrons Online and The Wall Street Journal (Issue 101274).

The 15.0.874.102 version( which now needs be removed ) has therefore become old more quickly than usual.

Was this reply relevant?

This thread has been marked as locked.