Forum Thread: PSI 2.0 builds 1001/ 1002/ 1003 changelog?

You are currently viewing a forum thread in the Secunia Community Forum. Please note that opinions expressed here are not of Secunia but solely reflect those of the user who wrote it.

This thread was submitted in the following forum:
PSI

This thread has been marked as locked.
Spiff PSI 2.0 builds 1001/ 1002/ 1003 changelog?
Member 30th Dec, 2010 23:43
Ranking: 22
Posts: 47
User Since: 22nd Dec, 2010
System Score: N/A
Location: NL
Last edited on 31st Dec, 2010 01:19


Hi everyone,

I notice that there have been Secunia PSI 2.0 builds 1001, 1002, and now build 1003.
I suppose some issues have been fixed in consecutive builds?

I think it would be good to know what has changed in the consecutive builds 1001, 1002 and 1003, so that users that encountered problems with build 1001 or 1002 can decide if they want to try build 1003.

There's a changelog that tells what's new in 2.0, but it doesn't tell about changes in builds 1001, 1002 and 1003.
http://secunia.com/products/consumer/PSI/changelog...
I think there's a need for detailed information on the different builds.


Best regards,
Spiff



fanghangbo

RE: PSI 2.0 builds 1001/ 1002/ 1003 changelog?
[+]
This reply has been deleted
Spiff RE: PSI 2.0 builds 1001/ 1002/ 1003 changelog?
Member 6th Jan, 2011 02:41
Score: 22
Posts: 47
User Since: 22nd Dec 2010
System Score: N/A
Location: NL
Last edited on 6th Jan, 2011 11:03
Dear Secunia,

Could you remove Fanhangbo's stupid spam posting
and leave my 30th Dec post as it was?
Thanks very much.


Best regards,
Spiff


Update
I see that spam posting has been deleted.
Thank you very much.


Was this reply relevant?
+0
-0
This user no longer exists RE: PSI 2.0 builds 1001/ 1002/ 1003 changelog?
Member 6th Jan, 2011 12:46
Hi,

I will ensure that your suggestion reaches our development team for consideration.

Thank you your feedback! If you have further suggestions or comments, please do not hesitate to post.

PS: No problem. ;) We rather dislike the spam on our end, too.
Was this reply relevant?
+0
-0

This thread has been marked as locked.